MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hegemony

2015· other· en· W4243265711 on OpenAlexaff
Edward A. Comor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Political Communication · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonySubalternDominance (genetics)BourgeoisieState (computer science)Power (physics)PoliticsSociologyInterdependenceCivil societyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hegemony, the process through which rule or dominance takes place involving the consent of the ruled, is a concept that was most fully elaborated by the early 20th‐century revolutionary Antonio Gramsci. Since then, it has been used to emphasize the interdependency of coercive and consensual forms of power, articulate the complex relationship between the state and civil society, and to explain why subaltern classes have not overthrown bourgeois political economic orders. Although, in recent years, the concept has been rejected by those theorizing the emergence of a post‐hegemonic era, hegemony remains an important tool for analysts and activists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Political CommunicationSame topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207