MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243272598 · doi:10.31501/esf.v2i7.6950

A Revolução como um evento ressonante: a materialidade generativa das insurreições

2016· article· pt· W4243272598 on OpenAlexaff
Gastón Gordillo

Bibliographic record

VenueEsferas · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo procura demonstrar que os conceitos frequentemente utilizados pela Filosofia e pelas Ciências Políticas e Sociais para descrever as insurreições são inadequados e parciais, pois em geral desconsideram o caráter material destas. Como alternativa e complementação para estas teorias, o texto propõe pensar as insurgências como eventos ressonantes. E, dessa forma, pretende demonstrar que a potência desses eventos só pode ser gerada pelos corpos que tomam as ruas em grande número, de forma contínua e ressoando em um ritmo compartilhado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEsferasSame topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207