MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243287260 · doi:10.1002/ntlf.20015

Table of Contents

2014· article· en· W4243287260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe National Teaching & Learning Forum · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Practises and Engagement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityMiracleSociologyArt historyPedagogyVisual artsManagementArtPsychologyTheologyPhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Team‐Based Learning: A High‐Impact Educational Strategy Neil Haave University of Alberta, Augustana Campus GLADO Ellen J. Langer Harvard University The “Finnish Miracle” in Education: Pedagogy, Policy, or Something Else? (part two) Mark Stoner with Matti Rautiainen, Olli‐Pekka Moisio, and Crystal Green CREATIVITY CAFÉ Creativity and the Flipped Classroom Charlie Sweet, Hal Blythe, and Rusty Carpenter Eastern Kentucky University DEVELOPER'S DIARY Metadisciplinary Awareness Can Illuminate the Meaning, Quality, and Integrity of College Degrees: Educating in Fractal Patterns XL Ed Nuhfer, (Geology & Faculty Development), Elisabeth Harrington (Music), Suzanne Pasztor (History), and Sarah Whorf (Art)—Humboldt State University AD REM … There's More To Critical Thinking Than We Think Marilla D. Svinicki The University of Texas at Austin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe National Teaching & Learning ForumSame topicHigher Education Practises and EngagementFrench-language works237,207