Philippe Despoix, Marie-Helene Benoit-Otis, Djemaa Maazouzi & Cecile Quesney (eds), Chanter, rire et résister à Ravensbrück : Autour de Germaine Tillion et du Verfügbar aux Enfers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le groupe de recherches « Mémoire musicale et résistance dans les camps » de l'Université de Montréal mène depuis plusieurs années un intéressant et rigoureux travail de recherches pluridisciplinaires autour du Verfügbar aux enfers, composé en 1944 par Germaine Tillion dans le camp de concentration de Ravensbrück.Dans le sillage de rencontres scientifiques et publications préalables de cette même équipe, l'ouvrage Chanter, rire et résister à Ravensbrück représente un aboutissement des recherches sur cette œuvre hybride, baptisée « opérette-revue » par Tillion.Les contributions riches et documentées s'organisent en deux parties : la première porte sur les divers « contextes » de cette « création atypique », tandis que la seconde analyse les processus mémoriels et créatifs dans l'œuvre elle-même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".