Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
William W. Demastes, Theatre of Chaos: Beyond Absurdism, into Orderly Disorder, reviewed by Jure Gantar Philip C. Kolin, ed., Tennessee Williams: A Guide to Research and Performance, reviewed by Brian Parker Alice Griffin, Understanding Tennessee Williams, reviewed by Brian Parker Annette J. Saddik, The Politics of Reputation: The Critical REception of Tennessee Williams' Later Plays, reviewed by Brian Parker Christopher Murray, Twentieth Century Irish Drama: A Mirror up to Nation, reviewed by Christopher Innes Alain Piette and Bert Cardullo, The Theatre of Fernand Crommelynck: Eight Plays, reviewed by David Willinger Alain Piette and Bert Cardullo, The Crommelynck Mystery: The Life and Work of a Belgian Playwright, reviewed by David Willinger Sheila Rabillard, ed., Essays on Caryl Churchill: Contemporary Representations, reviewed by Liorah Anne Golomb Lisa M. Anderson, No More: The Changing Image of Black Women on Stage and Screen, reviewed by Shelley Scott
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.424 | 0.431 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".