CBIR system using Capsule Networks and 3D CNN for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible disorder of the brain related to loss of memory, commonly seen in the elderly and aging population. Implementation of revolutionary computer aided diagnosis techniques with Content Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) has created new potentials in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relevant image retrieval and training for detection of progression of AD in early stages. This paper proposed a CBIR system using 3D Capsule Network, 3D-Convolutional Neural Network and pre-trained 3D-autoencoder technology for early detection of Alzheimer's. A 3D-Capsule Networks (CapsNets) is capable of fast learning, even for small datasets and can effectively handle robust image rotations and transitions. It was observed that an ensemble method using 3D-CapsNets and a convolutional neural network (CNN) with 3D-autoencoder, increased the detection performance comparing to Deep-CNN alone. CBIR using the proposed model was found to be up to 98.42% accurate in AD classification. CapsNet is a promising new technique for image classification, and further experiments using more robust computation resources and refined CapsNet architectures may produce better outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".