CBIR system using Capsule Networks and 3D CNN for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible disorder of the brain related to loss of memory, commonly seen in the elderly and aging population. Implementation of revolutionary computer aided diagnosis techniques with Content Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) has created new potentials in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relevant image retrieval and training for detection of progression of AD in early stages. This paper proposed a CBIR system using 3D Capsule Network, 3D-Convolutional Neural Network and pre-trained 3D-autoencoder technology for early detection of Alzheimer's. A 3D-Capsule Networks (CapsNets) is capable of fast learning, even for small datasets and can effectively handle robust image rotations and transitions. It was observed that an ensemble method using 3D-CapsNets and a convolutional neural network (CNN) with 3D-autoencoder, increased the detection performance comparing to Deep-CNN alone. CBIR using the proposed model was found to be up to 98.42% accurate in AD classification. CapsNet is a promising new technique for image classification, and further experiments using more robust computation resources and refined CapsNet architectures may produce better outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it