MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243396855 · doi:10.1017/s0074180900241983

IAS volume 221 Cover and Front matter

2004· article· en· W4243396855 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Minier, Steven N. Longmore, Danielle S. McNamara, J. W. Moody, Enid Livingston, Michael Burton, Ray Jayawardhana, Tyler L. Bourke

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium - International Astronomical Union · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsFront coverFront (military)Cover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Environmental scienceContent (measure theory)Computer scienceGeographyEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsMeteorologyMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Revealing star formation through increasing angular resolution in the source GI73.49+2.42 (S231-IR). Top-left is the IRAS 100Jl,m image of this 5 x let L 0 embedded object 1,800 pc away, harbouring a massive protostellar core. The position ofa methanol maser is marked with a cross, and two UCRn regions with squares. Four sub-millimetre sources are associated with the IRAS source (circles), and two of these are illustrated in the higher angular resolution view to top-right. This shows the JCMT image at 450Jl,m overlaid with contours of 21Jl,m emission, as imaged with the MSX satellite. The methanol maser is coincident with the brightest sub-mm and mid-IR core. Imaging this core with Gemini at 10Jl,m at arcsecond resolution resolves it into at least four sources (bottom-right). Probing it atmilli-arcsecond resolution with the European VLBI Network (EVN) shows three clusters of methanol masers (bottom-left), with a clear 2 km/s velocity gradient over the 100 AU extent of the eastern maser cluster. Scale bars show the relative angular resolution of each frame.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.069

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium - International Astronomical UnionSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207