MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243399415 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10502539.1

Multi-year isoscapes of lake water balances across a dynamic northern freshwater delta

2020· preprint· en· W4243399415 on OpenAlexaffabout
Casey R. Remmer, Laura K. Neary, Mitchell L. Kay, Brent B. Wolfe, Roland I. Hall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable approaches are needed to track status and trends of lake water balances in complex, remote freshwater landscapes. Here we use water isotope composition measured at ~60 lakes and 9 river sites three times during the 2015-2019 ice-free seasons at the internationally recognized Peace-Athabasca Delta (Canada) to characterize temporal and spatial patterns in lake water balances and influential hydrological processes. Calculation of evaporation-to-inflow ratios using a coupled-isotope tracer approach, employment of generalized additive models and geospatial ‘isoscapes’ identified areas vulnerable to mid-summer evaporative lake-level drawdown and areas more resilient due to replenishment by river floodwaters during spring ice-jams and the open-water season. The former largely defines the northern, relic Peace sector whereas the latter typifies the more active floodplain environment of the southern Athabasca sector. Ability to capture the marked temporal and spatial heterogeneity in lake water balances serves as a foundation for ongoing isotope-based hydrological monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→