Bibliographic record
Abstract
Makanan pendampingASI (MP-ASI adalah makanan yang paling penting untuk mencukupi kebutuhan gizi bayi, selain ASI sebagai makanan utama. tingkat pengetahuan yang kurang, ibu bekerja pendaptan rendah, kunjungan ibu ke pelayanan kesehatan yang tidak rutin dapat mempengaruhi pemberian MP-ASI. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan tingkat pengetahuan dan pekerjaan ibu menyusui dengan pemberian MP-ASI. Metode penelitian ini adalah korelasional dengan pendekatan cross sectional, sampel di ambil secara simple random sampling sebanyak 72 orang ibu sedang menyusui. Data yang dikumpulkan adalah data primer dengan menggunakan kuisioner terstruktur dan di analisa dengan menggunakan ditribusi frekuensi Chi-square dan Mann-Whitney test. Penelitian dilakukan di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Jalaksana Kabupaten Kuningan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh bahwa teradapat hubungan tingkat Pengetahuan ibu dengan penberian MP-ASI denagn nilai X2 hitung (7,610)>X2 tabel (3,841) denagn p = 0,006 <α = 0,05, dan ada hubungan pekerjaan ibu dengan pemberian MP-ASI denagn nilai X2 hitung (6,522) >X2 table (3,841) dengan p = 0,011<α = 0,05. Kata kunci: Pengetahuan, pekerjaan dan pemberian MP-ASI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.300 | 0.157 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".