MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243462202 · doi:10.1109/28.924773

A new current-source converter using a symmetric gate-commutated thyristor (SGCT)

2001· article· en· W4243462202 on OpenAlexaff
Navid R. Zargari, S. Rizzo, Yuan Xiao, H. Iwamoto, K. Satoh, John F. Donlon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyristorSnubberGate turn-off thyristorIntegrated gate-commutated thyristorPulse-width modulationElectrical engineeringMOS-controlled thyristorElectronic engineeringInverterReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringStatic induction thyristorTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceVoltagePower (physics)CapacitorPhysicsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, extensive semiconductor development has gone into both bipolar and MOS structures for medium-voltage (MV) applications. However, the progression of MOS structures in MV applications has been difficult and the issues of module isolation, reliability, and d/spl nu//dt and motor/bearing life continue to limit its acceptance in these applications. A more suitable device structure and the natural choice for MV applications is the bipolar thyristor structure. The device that has been in use for many years, the gate-turn-off thyristor, is being replaced by the gate-commutated thyristor (GCT). So far, the GCT has been only thought of as fulfilling the needs for the voltage-source topology. However, the symmetric GCT (SGCT) is viable and has significant advantages when implemented in a pulsewidth-modulated current-source inverter (PWM-CSI). This paper describes the design and characteristics of an 800-A 6.5-kV SGCT and the effect of its implementation in a PWM-CSI. These effects include operation at a higher switching frequency, elimination/reduction and modification of the snubber circuitry, reduction in size of the passive components, and a major impact on the cost of the converter. The paper includes experimental results on a 4160-V 1250-hp PWM-CSI AC motor drive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207