MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243515442 · doi:10.1515/energyo.0154.00006

An investigation of the melting process of RT-35 filled circular thermal energy storage system

2019· dataset· en· W4243515442 on OpenAlexaff
Soroush Ebadi, Manar Al-Jethelah, Syeda Humaira Tasnim, Shohel Mahmud

Bibliographic record

Venueenergyo · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal energy storageProcess (computing)ThermalMaterials scienceEnergy storageNuclear engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceThermodynamicsEngineeringPhysicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main solutions to the issue of global warming and greenhouse gas emission caused by burning fossil fuels is storing energy in an efficient way. In this work, the detailed melting process of RT-35 as a phase change material (PCM) inside a cylindrical latent heat thermal energy storage (TES) system is investigated both numerically and experimentally. To achieve this aim, an experimental setup comprising of a transparent vertical cylindrical enclosure as a latent heat TES system, a constant temperature bath, and a temperature regulator is built. Moreover, a numerical model using COMSOL multiphysics is developed to simulate the melting process and provide a more detailed information on the flow and thermal fields. The model is able to provide the temperature and velocity fields, heat transfer behaviour, melting fraction, and the trend of solid-liquid interface at different time intervals. To validate the numerical model, a comparison between melting fraction and solid-liquid interfaces of the numerical model and experimental work is conducted which shows a good agreement between experimental and numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueenergyoSame topicPhase Change Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207