MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243520228 · doi:10.29007/pjn4

Computation of Some Integer Sequences in Maple

2017· paratext· en· W4243520228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEasyChair preprint · 2017
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMaple Leaf FoodsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaplePartition (number theory)Integer (computer science)Stirling numbers of the second kindEulerian pathContext (archaeology)Sequence (biology)MathematicsComputationStirling numberInteger programmingStirling numbers of the first kindValue (mathematics)Computer scienceDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsAlgorithmApplied mathematicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider some integer sequences connected with combinatorial applications. Specifically, we consider Stirling partition and cycle numbers, associated Stirling partition and cycle numbers, and Eulerian numbers of the first and second kinds. We consider their evaluation in different contexts. One context is the calculation of a single value based on single input arguments. A more common context, however, is the calculation of a sequence of values. We compare strategies for both. Where possible, we compare with existing Maple implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it