MétaCan
← all works

Informational Autocrats

2019· article· en· 484 citations· W4243546566 on OpenAlex· 10.1257/jep.33.4.100

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread
0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

In recent decades, dictatorships based on mass repression have largely given way to a new model based on the manipulation of information. Instead of terrorizing citizens into submission, “informational autocrats” artificially boost their popularity by convincing the public they are competent. To do so, they use propaganda and silence informed members of the elite by co-optation or censorship. Using several sources, including a newly created dataset on authoritarian control techniques, we document a range of trends in recent autocracies consistent with this new model: a decline in violence, efforts to conceal state repression, rejection of official ideologies, imitation of democracy, a perceptions gap between the masses and the elite, and the adoption by leaders of a rhetoric of performance rather than one aimed at inspiring fear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
The Journal of Economic Perspectives
Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Field
Social Sciences
Canadian institutions
Funders
Università BocconiEuropean University InstituteToulouse School of EconomicsUniversity of WarwickYork UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political Science
Keywords
CensorshipEliteAuthoritarianismIdeologyPopularityAutocracyDictatorshipPolitical scienceImitationDemocracyPublic opinionRhetoricState (computer science)Political economyLawSociologyMedia studiesSocial psychologyPoliticsPsychology
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes