MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243562032 · doi:10.17118/11143/11929

Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. Numéro 6 (automne 2017), Varia

2017· paratext· fr· W4243562032 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCircula · 2017
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen: El periodista Álex Grijelmo es el más destacado "cronista" (columnista) del lenguaje en la España actual.Con sus artículos se inscribe en una tradición textual representada, entre otros, por el lingüista Fernando Lázaro Carreter.El análisis cualitativo de un corpus de 121 columnas permite describir un ideal normativo basado en el concepto retórico de la puritas.Situando el problema de la ejemplaridad lingüística en una dialéctica bastante sofisticada entre los niveles de la lengua y el discurso, Grijelmo defiende una norma prescriptiva mucho más elitista que la de las Academias de la lengua española.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculaSame topicLiterary and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207