MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243570040 · doi:10.1190/1.9781560802235.ch12

12. Imaging Oil-Sands Reservoir Heterogeneities Using Wide-Angle Prestack Seismic Inversion

2010· book-chapter· en· W4243570040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Baishali Roy, Phil D. Anno, Michael Gurch

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety of Exploration Geophysicists eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrestackLibrary scienceGeologyArchaeologyEngineeringGeographyComputer scienceSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Mass density, because of its linear relationship with porosity, has long been recognized as a potential seismic indicator of fluid saturation. Given its dependence on mineral composition, density can also be diagnostic for lithology. In this chapter, we discuss some key aspects of a wide-angle processing and density inversion workflow and apply it to a bitumen reservoir in Canada for imaging reservoir heterogeneities (e.g., shales) that can potentially act as permeability baffles. In this field, intrareservoir shales typically have higher densities than surrounding reservoir sands. This wide-angle workflow yields stable density estimates, from reflected P-waves alone, at a resolution suitable for mapping the intrareservoir shales. This study is based on data from the Surmont bitumen reservoir approximately 60 km southeast of Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, in the Lower Cretaceous McMurray formation. The oil is too deep (400 m) to mine. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology is being used to inject steam into the reservoir and heat the oil so that it can be produced. Shale heterogeneities within the reservoir (Figure 1) thicker than 3 m could have an impact on steam chamber development and affect SAGD performance. Predicting the areal extent and the thickness of these bodies would lead to better reservoir management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociety of Exploration Geophysicists eBooksSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207