MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243614230 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11761

Development of Raman Micro-Spectroscopy to Characterize Human Ovarian Cancer Cells

2017· dissertation· en· W4243614230 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Moradi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyPrincipal component analysisOvarian carcinomaLinear discriminant analysisSpectroscopyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Raman scatteringBiological systemOvarian cancerChemistryOpticsBiologyComputer scienceCancerChromatographyArtificial intelligencePhysicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational spectroscopy technique and has demonstrated highly desirable unique analytical capabilities throughout the field of biomedical optics.It has the ability to obtain sensitive measurements of molecular composition, structure and dynamics from very small sample volumes in a non-destructive, non-invasive and label free manner.This makes it useful in the study of the cells as well as tissues.In this work a Raman micro-spectrometer system was developed and applied in vitro to discriminate between the ovarian carcinoma cell lines A2780s (parental wild type) and A2780cp (cisplatin cross radio-resistant variant).These two cell lines represent a good model of tumor tissues of similar origin but with different intrinsic chemo-and radio-sensitivities.Moreover, their radiobiological behavior has been extensively studied and their survival curves under different irradiation schemes are known.The Raman spectra collected from individual cells undergo initial preprocessing (background subtraction, normalization and noise reduction) to yield true Raman spectra representative of the cells.These spectra are analyzed with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) followed by Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to yield a strong separation between the cell lines.The objective of this work was to characterize the spectral differences between the two cell types in order to determine the underlying biochemical basis for this separation.The multivariate classification model constructed using such Raman spectra of ovarian cancer cells could potentially be utilized for early prediction of tumor response.This project provided many challenges, and I was fortunate to receive support from many great people along the way.First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Sangeeta Murugkar for her patience and guidance throughout this journey.It's been an absolute privilege working with her.Many thanks also to Carleton Biophotonics Research Group (CBRG) Abrar Ahmad and Dean Sheperdson for helping me with construction of our system, and without them I strongly doubt we would have been capable of getting it running in such short time.I would like to thank my dearest friend Nima Sherafati for helping me whenever I needed him.His support has been a guiding light for me.I would also like to thank our new members, Christopher Dedek, Harry Allen, and Achint Kumar,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207