MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243614851 · doi:10.1017/s0261444803231955

Reading and writing

2003· article· en· W4243614851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign languageReading (process)LiteracyApplied linguisticsPsychologyLinguisticsSociologyHumanitiesArtPedagogyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

03–496 Basil, C. (Universitat de Barcelona, Spain) and Reyes, S. Acquisition of literacy skills by children with severe disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy (London, UK), 19, 1 (2003), 27–48. 03–497 Bimmell, Peter (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Holland). Strategisch lesen lernen in der Fremdsprache. [Learning to read strategically in a foreign language.] Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung (Berlin, Germany), 13, 1 (2002), 113–141. 03–498 Casanave, C. P. (Teachers College Columbia, Japan); Email: casanave@redshift.com ). Multiple uses of Applied Linguistics literature in a multidisciplinary graduate EAP class. ELT Journal, 57, 1 (2003), 43–50. 03–499 Cheng, Yuh-show (National Taiwan Normal U.). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 33, 5 (2002), 647–656. 03–500 Cotterall, S. (Email: sara.cotterall@vuw.ac.nz ) and Cohen, R. (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand). Scaffolding for second language writers: producing an academic essay. ELT Journal, 57, 2 (2003), 158–166. 03–501 de Serres, Linda (U. of Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada). Stratégies de lecture en français L1 et en anglais L2 chez des universitaires diplômés: aspects quantitatifs. [Reading strategies in graduate university students with L1 French and L2 English: quantitative aspects.] The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 1 (2003), 31–51. 03–502 Droop, Mienke and Verhoeven, Ludo (U. of Nijmegen, NL). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly (Newark, USA), 38, 1 (2003), 78–103. 03–503 Gillon, Gail T. (U. of Canterbury, New Zealand; Email: g.gillon@spth.canterbury.ac.nz ). Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (London, UK), 37, 4 (2002), 381–400. 03–504 Gu, Peter Yongqi (Nanyang Technological University). Fine Brush and Freehand: The Vocabulary-Learning Art of Two Successful Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 1 (2003), 73–104. 03–505 Kamhi-Stein, Lía D. (California State University, USA). Reading in Two Languages: How Attitudes Toward Home Language and Beliefs About Reading Affect the Behaviors of “Underprepared” L2 College Readers. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 1 (2003), 35–71. 03–506 Mahfoudhi, Abdessatar (U. Ottawa, Canada). Writing processes of EFL students in argumentative essays: a case study. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics (Leuven, Belgium), 139–140 (2003), 153–190. 03–507 Martin, Michelle E. and Byrne, Brian (U. of New England, NSW, Australia). Teaching children to recognise rhyme does not directly promote phonemic awareness. British Journal of Educational Psychology (Leicester, UK), 72 (2002), 561–572. 03–508 Miller, Carol (U. of Birmingham, UK; Email: c.j.miller@bham.ac.uk ), Lacey, Penny and Layton, Lyn. Including children with special educational needs in the Literacy Hour: a continuing challenge. British Journal of Special Education (Oxford, UK), 30, 1 (2003), 13–20. 03–509 Schoonen, R. (U. of Amsterdam, NL), Gelderen, A.v., Glopper, K.d., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P. and Stevenson, M. First Language and Second Language Writing: The Role of Linguistic Knowledge, Speed of Processing, and Metacognitive Knowledge. Language Learning (Clevdon, UK), 53, 1 (2003), 165–202. 03–510 Suh, Jae-Suk (Keimyung U.). Effectiveness of CALL writing instruction: The voices of Korean EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 35, 6 (2002), 669–679. 03–511 Taylor, M. E. (University of the West Indies, Jamaica). Using collateral material to improve writing performance. ELT Journal, 57, 2 (2003), 149–157. 03–512 Wall, Kate (U. of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Email: Kate.Wall@ncl.ac.uk ). Pupils with special needs and the National Literacy Strategy: an analysis of the literature. Support for Learning (Oxford, UK), 18, 1 (2003), 35–41. 03–513 Wenyu Wang (Nanjing U., China; Email: wywang@nju.edu.cn ) and Qiufang Wen. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing (Orlando, FL, USA), 11 (2002), 225–246.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2190.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage TeachingSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207