MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243632271 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-35741/v2

Effects of three methods of breast milk expression on breastfeeding initiation, breast milk extraction and proportion of exclusive breastfeeding—an open label, randomized controlled trial

2020· preprint· en· W4243632271 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Zhou, Jiaying Ni, Chenchen Zhou, Ying Chen, Julian Little, Lin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersShanghai Hospital Development CenterShanghai Municipal Health Bureau
KeywordsBreastfeedingBreast milkMedicineBreast feedingRandomized controlled trialLactationOpen labelObstetricsInternal medicinePediatricsPregnancyBiologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Direct breastfeeding has multiple health benefits. Some mothers need to express their breasts when directly breast feeding is unavailable immediately after delivery. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding an effective method of breast milk expression in the absence of an infant's suction. This trial was designed to investigate the effects of different methods of breast milk expression on breastfeeding initiation, efficacy of breast milk extraction, and on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Methods The participants of mother-infant dyads separated immediately after birth for at least 6 hrs were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1:1) into three groups: (1) hand expression of breast milk; (2) sequential and (3) simultaneous electrical breast pumping. The two primary outcome measures were the time required for initiation of breastfeeding and the milk volume expressed in a 10-minute session (direct breastfeeding in hand expression group) at 3 days and at 6 weeks; a secondary outcome was the proportion of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. Intention-to-treat data set was used in this analysis. Results Between 2018 and 2019, we recruited 226 participants, of whom 154 were randomized. The median time (in hour) of breastfeeding initiation of sequential (46.5, 95% CI 36.1-50.5) and simultaneous (45.6, 95% CI 34.2-53.0) breast pumping groups did not differ from those of hand expression (46.7, 95% CI 40.8-50.0) (p=1.000). At 3 days the breast volume through simultaneous pumping (13.1±10.9 ml), but not sequential pumping (16.7±11.6 ml) (p=0.560), was significantly less than hand expression (23.8±26.2 ml through direct sucking) (p=0.007). At 6 weeks the breast volume through sequential pumping (64.7±51.0 ml), but not simultaneous pumping (71.6±50.8 ml) (p=0.670), was significantly less than hand expression (89.8±67.3 ml through direct sucking) (p=0.035). The breast milk volume through sequential breast pumping (10 min per breast) was 37.9 ml less than those of simultaneous pumping (p=0.000). The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months was 21.0%, and at 6 months 10.6%, and did not differ between the three methods of breast milk expression. Conclusions Hand expression, sequential breast pumping, or simultaneous breast pumping in absence of immediate infant suction after birth did not show differences on the time required to initiate breastfeeding, or on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. Trial registration This trial was registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800018193) on 4 September 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207