MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243632416 · doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0051

Uses and Functions of Formulaic Sequences in Second-Language Speech: An Exploration of the Foundations of Fluency

2006· article· en· W4243632416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluencyNarrativeRepetition (rhetorical device)Rhetorical questionLinguisticsComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Spoken languageSpeech productionPsychologySpeech recognitionNatural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formulaic sequences are fixed combinations of words that have a range of functions and uses in speech production and communication, and seem to be cognitively stored and retrieved by speakers as if they were single words. They can facilitate fluency in speech by making pauses shorter and less frequent, and allowing longer runs of speech between pauses. The present study was undertaken to identify the uses and functions of formulaic sequences in the development of speech fluency in narrative retelling in English as a second language (ESL). Spontaneous spoken narrative retells by ESL learners were analyzed for ways in which use of formulaic sequences may have facilitated fluency growth over a six-month period, be they pragmatic, functional, or strategic. Five categories of formula use emerged: repetition of a formula; use of multiple formulas to extend a run; reliance on one formula; use of self-talk and filler formulas; and use of formulas as rhetorical devices. These categories are illustrated by excerpts from transcripts of learner speech. Les expressions stéréotypées sont des combinaisons fixes de mots qui ont divers usages et rôles dans la production du langage et la communication. Elles semblent être cognitivement enregistrées et récupérées par les usagers comme s'il s'agissait d'un seul mot. Ces expressions peuvent améliorer la fluidité verbale d'un discours en diminuant la longueur et la fréquence des pauses, et en permettant de plus longues séquences de discours ininterrompues entre les pauses. La présente étude a été effectuée dans le but de déterminer l'usage et le rôle des expressions stéréotypées dans le développement de la fluidité verbale pour les exposés redits en anglais, langue seconde (ALS). On a analysé les exposés oraux redits spontanément par des étudiants en ALS afin de trouver comment les expressions stéréotypées ont favorisé le développement de la fluidité au cours d'une période de six mois, peu importe que les expressions soient pragmatiques, fonctionnelles ou stratégiques. Cinq catégories d'expressions se sont dégagées : la répétition d'une expression ; l'enchaînement de multiples expressions ; le recours à une [End Page 13] seule expression ; l'emploi de la verbalisation intérieure et d'expressions de remplissage ; et l'emploi d'expressions comme figure de style. Pour chacune de ces catégories, on donne des exemples tirés de la transcription des discours des étudiants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it