MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243681029 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-669-4_3

At the Crossroads

2011· book-chapter· en· W4243681029 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCommunication in Education and Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySocial psychologyMathematics educationPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I began the present inquiry with the intent of examining my role in the conflicts that occur between me and my students in our classroom. According to Long (2000), in many conflicts between teachers and students, the teacher is responsible for escalating the conflict. Although students may initiate the conflict, in most cases, the teacher’s responses trigger further inappropriate behaviours. My goal was to examine my actions when dealing with students who exhibited some kind of inappropriate behaviours, and then look for patterns or habits that either improved the situation or made it worse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicCommunication in Education and HealthcareFrench-language works237,207