MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem com paciente oncológico em cuidados paliativos: sob um olhar referencial na teoria de adaptação de Callista Roy

2020· article· pt· W4243696534 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Camila Oliveira da Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Patrícia de Mello Souza, Patricia Marques Ribeiro de Mello Pinheiro, Aline Oliveira Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Recien · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative and Oncologic Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPalliative careNursingMedicineGerontologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O trabalho será embasado em uma teoria de Callista Roy e aplicabilidade do processo de enfermagem com subsídio na Escala de Edmonton/Edmonton Symptom Assesment System (ESAS). Essa teoria de adaptação está sob supervisão do profissional enfermeiro, que se suprirá de informações significativas a respeito do paciente e requer dedicação e habilidade de forma que suas ações influenciem de maneira eficaz a adaptação do indivíduo. Este estudo tem como objetivo identificar os diagnósticos de enfermagem ao paciente oncológico relacionado à Escala de Edmonton aplicando a teoria de adaptação. Trata-se de uma pesquisa bibliográfica descritiva com abordagem qualitativa. Para isso, foram utilizados artigos publicados em revistas científicas, livros e manuais práticos pertinentes com o assunto. Observou-se que pacientes com câncer terminal se apresentam de forma expressiva nos últimos anos, com isso, houve a necessidade do profissional de enfermagem aperfeiçoar seus conhecimentos, habilidades e técnicas, devido a assistência continua prestada.Descritores: Cuidados Paliativos, Enfermagem Oncológica, Teoria de Enfermagem. Systematization of nursing care for cancer patients in palliative care: from a referential point of view on Callista Roy adaptation theoryAbstract: The work will be based on a theory of Callista Roy and applicability of the nursing process with subsidy on the Edmonton/Edmonton Symptom Assesment System (ESAS) Scale. This adaptation theory is under the supervision of the professional nurse, who will supply significant information about the patient and requires dedication and skill so that his actions effectively influence the individual's adaptation. This study aims to identify nursing diagnoses for cancer patients related to the Edmonton Scale by applying the adaptation theory. It is a descriptive bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. For this, articles published in scientific journals, books and practical manuals relevant to the subject were used. It was observed that patients with terminal cancer have presented themselves significantly in recent years, with this, there was a need for the nursing professional to improve their knowledge, skills and techniques, due to the continuous assistance provided.Descriptors: Palliative Care, Oncology Nursing and Nursing Theory. Sistematización de la atención de enfermería al paciente oncológico en cuidados paliativos: desde un punto de vista referencial a la teoría de adaptación de Callista RoyResumen: El trabajo se base en una teoría de Callista Roy y la aplicabilidad del proceso de enfermería con subsidio en la Escala del Sistema de Evaluación de Síntomas Edmonton/Edmonton (ESAS). Esta teoría de la adaptación está bajo la supervisión de la enfermera profesional, que proporcionará información significativa sobre el paciente y requiere dedicación y habilidad para que sus acciones influyan efectivamente en la adaptación del individuo. Este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar diagnósticos de enfermedad de enfermería para pacientes con cáncer relacionados con la Escala de Edmonton mediante la aplicación de la teoría de la adaptación. Es una investigación bibliográfica descriptiva con un enfoque cualitativo. Para ello, se utilizaron artículos publicados en revistas científicas, libros y manuales prácticos relevantes para el tema. Se observó que los pacientes con cáncer terminal se han presentado significativamente en los últimos años, con esto, era necesario que el profesional de enfermería mejorara sus conocimientos, habilidades y técnicas, debido a la asistencia continua brindada.Descriptores: Cuidados Paliativos, Enfermería Oncológica, Teoría de Enfermería.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista RecienSame topicPalliative and Oncologic CareFrench-language works237,207