MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243812343 · doi:10.14740/jem295w

Pituitary Metastasis From Breast Cancer Presenting as SIADH

2015· article· en· W4243812343 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James Orsini, Adaeze Nwosu-Iheme, Sowmini Medavaram, Alice J. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeadachesBreast cancerHyponatremiaMetastatic breast cancerMetastasisOncologyInternal medicineBiopsyCancerRadiologyPathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pituitary metastasis is rare and unusual but can be seen in advanced breast and lung cancers with patients presenting with symptoms that range from mild headaches to seizures and altered mental status due to hyponatremia. A 53-year-old female with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast which was hormone positive, presented 5 years after completion of therapy with a dry cough, hyponatremia, weakness and visual disturbance. An MRI of the brain revealed a pituitary mass, compressing the optic chiasm. Hyponatremia was found to be due to SIADH. Biopsy confirmed metastatic breast carcinoma. Metastatic spread to the pituitary gland is rare (comprising less than 1% of pituitary tumors) but can occur in patients with advanced breast and lung cancers. Presentation with SIADH has previously not been reported with metastases due to breast cancer. Diagnosis may require biopsy or resection of the pituitary. Despite aggressive intervention, the prognosis is poor. J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;5(4):256-260 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jem295w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207