Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le xxe siècle, qualifié par Felix Hobsbawm d’« âge des extrêmes », a été particulièrement marqué par le désir de repousser les limites, qu’elles soient politiques, morales ou esthétiques. Ces dernières sont transgressées par les avant-gardes artistiques qui cherchent à subvertir les codes classiques. Parmi elles, les artistes femmes remettent en question plus particulièrement le genre avec une certaine radicalité grâce à l’invention de procédés spécifiques. Cet article porte sur la pratique du photomontage par Hannah Höch (artiste dadaïste berlinoise) et Wangechi Mutu (artiste contemporaine kenyane) dans des contextes différents. Les deux créatrices font du collage une véritable technique féministe ayant pour objet de déconstruire les catégories et tendant à une forme d’universalité. Dans leur production, l’extrême qualifie la relation entre l’artiste, l’oeuvre et le spectateur ou la spectatrice et il inclut paradoxalement une limite, celle du regard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".