Reconnaissance syndicale — Demande de retrait d'un certificat de reconnaissance syndicale pour défaut de majorité absolue — Droit de l'employeur, de faire une telle demande
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prétention que l'employeur n'est pas admis, selon les dispositions de la Loi des Relations ouvrières, à soumettre une requête en vue d'un retrait d'un certificat pour le motif que le groupement certifié ne détient plus la majorité absolue, doit être rejetée. Le droit d'association ne doit pas être confondu avec le droit au certificat. La portée très large de l'article 41 de la L.R.O. comprend la considération d'une telle demande de la part d'un employeur. Les Boiseries Plessis Enrg. -vs- Le Syndicat National du Bois ouvré de Tlessisville; M. le juge Théodore Lespérance, président, MM. J.-E. Corbeil et Benoît Tousignant, commissaires; Commissions des Relations ouvrières de Québec, D-131, Montréal, le 30 juin 1961. — Procureurs: Laplante, Gagné, Trottier, Letarte et Brown, pour la requérante; Me Majella Lemay, C.T., pour l'intimé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".