Analysis of the load flow behaviour near a Jacobian singularity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New theoretical results above the behavior of the load flow solution near a Jacobian singularity are presented. The principal result is the derivation of an analytic closed-form relation between the specified injections and the resulting voltages in the neighborhood of a singularity. This result is a companion to the conventional load flow sensitivity analysis which is valid only if the operating point is not at a Jacobian singularity. The new closed-form relation derived is theoretically important since it can predict and explain the main load flow phenomena observed through simulation analysis near a singularity. These are: the nonexistence of solutions for certain injection changes, the bifurcation of the voltages into two nearby solutions, the sudden collapse of voltages for small injection changes, and the nature of the collapse, that is, which buses are more susceptible to the collapse. Numerical simulations support the validity of the theoretical result by comparing the closed-form analytic relation near a singularity with exact load flow simulations.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it