Abstract 1111: Embryoinc Stem Cell Derived Cardiovascular Progenitor Cells Improve Function More Than Hemangioblasts in a Mouse Model of Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intramyocardial transplantation of stem cells improves left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in animal studies and preliminary clinical trials. The mechanism may involve either replacement of myocytes or improved vascular supply to existing myocytes. We recently identified an Embyronic Stem cell derived cardiovascular progenitor cell (ES-CPC) that is the common precursor of cardiomyocyte and vascular cell lineages. To determine whether myocyte transplantation improves myocardial function more than angiogenesis alone does, we compared the effect of ES-CPCs to hemangioblasts (vascular/hematopoetic progenitor cells) on EF in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. METHODS: ES-CPC and hemangioblasts were isolated from a doxycycline-responsive, Notch-inducible ES cell line containing Notch 4 cDNA under the control of a tetracycline-inducible promoter. Notch induction of mesoderm-derived ES cells resulted in a CPC phenotype, whereas non-induced cells developed into hemangioblasts. Mice underwent transplantation of 500,000 ES-CPC (n=20), hemangioblasts (n=16), or an equal volume of serum-free media (n=12) 30 minutes after surgically-induced myocardial infarction. All cell lines constitutively expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP). EF was assessed two weeks post-transplantation using 9.4 Tesla MRI. Mice were then euthanized and frozen heart sections were examined using fluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: The mean EF was 59Â ± 15, 46Â ± 17, and 39Â ± 13% in the ES-CPC, hemangioblast, and control groups, respectively (p<0.05 for the differences among all 3 groups; ANOVA). GFP + cells were detected in frozen sections of both the ES-CPC and hemangioblast groups. GFP + cells in ES-CPC treated hearts expressed markers associated with both cardiomyocyte and vascular phenotypes, whereas the GFP + cells in the hemangioblast group expressed markers associated with vascular phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Both hemangioblast and ES-CPC transplantation improves EF in a mouse model of myocardial infarction, but ES-CPC transplantation was more effective. This suggests that enhancement of myocardial function by transplantation of both cardiomyocyte and vascular phenotypes exceeds that with vascular phenotypes alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".