Acid-base analysis during experimental anemia in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study evaluated the acid-base status of anemic rats by using two approaches of acid-base analysis: one based on the base excess (BE) calculation and the other based on Stewart's physicochemical analysis. Two sets of experimental data, derived from two different methods of inducing anemia, were used: repetitive doses of phenylhydrazine (PHZ) and bleeding (BL). A significant uncompensated respiratory alkalosis was found in both groups of anemic rats. BE increased slightly, whereas strong ion difference ([SID]) and weak acid buffers ([A TOT ]) remained unchanged in anemic rats. The reasons for the absence of compensation for hypocapnia and the differences in the behaviour of acid-base variables are discussed. BE increase was considered paradoxical; its calculation was affected by the experimental conditions and BE had little physiological relevance during anemia. The absence of metabolic renal compensation in anemic rats could be due to a lower pH in the kidney due to anemic hypoxia. Finally, the changes in buffer strength related to low Hb and low Pc0 2 might influence plasma [SID] through counteracted shifts of strong ions between erythrocytes and plasma, finally resulting in unchanged [SID] during anemia.Key words: anemia, phenylhydrazine, bleeding, base excess, strong ion difference, non-carbonic buffers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".