MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243883138 · doi:10.2523/97922-ms

Wellbore Hydraulics in a SAGD Well Pair

2005· article· en· W4243883138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Swapan Kumar Das

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsCitationLift (data mining)PetroleumSteam injectionPetroleum engineeringHydraulicsEngineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Well Bore Hydraulics in a SAGD Well Pair Swapan Kumar Das Swapan Kumar Das ConocoPhillips Co Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. Paper Number: SPE-97922-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/97922-MS Published: November 01 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Das, Swapan Kumar. "Well Bore Hydraulics in a SAGD Well Pair." Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/97922-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractIn SAGD process a pair of horizontal wells is drilled at the base of a heavy oil and bitumen reservoir, vertically one above the other. Steam is injected into the upper well and the heated and mobilized bitumen drains to the bottom producer and is withdrawn either by natural lift or artificial lift. Uniform distribution of steam along the entire length of the well bore is very important for the uniform growth of the steam chamber. This is very important to make the entire length of the well productive.Pressure drop along the length of the injector and producer may cause steam break through in one segment and build up of liquid level between the wells. Generally steam is injected at the heel and the toe of the well and is distributed along the entire length primarily through slotted liner. It is expected that this will provide a higher quality steam at the toe end of the well. However, with out proper design the counter current heat transfer between the two streams may result in delivering a poor quality to the toe. In the producer it is necessary to withdraw fluid from the toe and heel. In a concentric design this may cause serious lifting problem if the tubulars are not designed properly and the split between the streams is not right. This paper presents the issues related to SAGD well bore design.IntroductionWell bore plays the second most important role in a SAGD operation, just next to the reservoir quality. The injector well bore needs to be large enough to deliver the injected steam uniformly along the length of the horizontal well bore. The producer well bore should be capable of draining all the fluids (reservoir deliverability) and efficiently produce it to the surface. It is most desirable to produce the fluids without any artificial lift. However, with the larger volume of production some form of artificial lifts may be necessary.Most of the commercial SAGD wells are expected to produce in the range of 600 - 1500 m3/d of total fluid under normal operating conditions after the initial ramp up period. The corresponding injector well should have the capacity of 400–1200 m3/d CWE (cold water equivalent) of steam injection. In addition to this requirement for the normal operating condition, these well bores should be suitable for handling the smaller volumes of fluids encountered during the circulation start up phase. Some times these start up volumes are an order of magnitude lower than the normal production rates. The production ramp up period ranges from 12 - 24 months period, where the injection and production rates go from a small volume to the normal operating range. Keywords: injection, surface pressure, flow rate, injector, liner, sagd, vertical section, circulation rate, producer well, pressure drop Subjects: Drilling Operations, Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Directional drilling, Thermal methods This content is only available via PDF. 2005. SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207