L’éducation à la citoyenneté : une responsabilité désormais explicite à l’école québécoise d’accord, mais au nom de quelles valeurs ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partant d’une analyse des visées de l’éducation à la citoyenneté dans les discours des organismes mondiaux voués à la promotion de l’éducation, de la politique éducative québécoise et des programmes d’études du primaire et du secondaire qui l’actualisent, ainsi que de la recherche sur les buts et les moyens mis à la disposition du personnel enseignant pour l’intervention en ce sens, cet article met en relief les grandes orientations de l’éducation à la citoyenneté de manière à dégager ses valeurs fondatrices. Puis, une étude empirique auprès de novices en enseignement au secondaire permet d’identifier les valeurs que ceux-ci disent vivre dans leur pratique quotidienne d’éducation et de les mettre en relation avec les valeurs des grandes orientations de l’éducation à la citoyenneté. Starting with an analysis of the goals of citizenship education, as seen in the discourses of world organizations devoted to the promotion of education, Québec educational policy, elementary and secondary programs of study, as well as research on the goals and means available to teaching personnel in this domain, this paper dwells upon the major orientations of citizenship education so as to bring out its founding values. Then, an empirical study of beginning secondary teachers, permits an identification of the values reportedly lived in their daily educational practices and their linkage to the major orientations of citizenship education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".