From the chair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Happy New Year! I hope this year brings you health, happiness, and good cheer!Thanks to those of you who attended the "Sixth Annual ACM-SIGMIS Reception," held as an ACM-SIGMIS event prior to the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2006) in Milwaukee, WI USA. It was great fun seeing everyone. Please visit ACM-SIGMIS's website at: http://www.acm.org/sigmis to view photos from this event. Mark your calendar now for next year's reception, scheduled for Saturday, December 8, 2007, from 5:30-7:00pm, prior to ICIS2007 to be held in Montreal, Canada, December 9-12, 2007.Just a reminder for this year's CPR2007 conference and Doctoral Consortium: Conference: ACM-SIGMIS Computer Personnel Research 2007 Conference Theme: "The Global Information Technology Workforce" When & Where: April 19-21, 2007, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Doctoral Consortium: April 19, 2007 Website: http://www.sigmis.org .The beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina, USA is the venue for next year's CPR2008. Please consider sending a submission by the October 2007 deadline. Your participation is welcome!Also, please consider attending the upcoming conferences this year with which we are in-cooperation: Autonomous Infrastructure, Management, and Security (AIMS), http://www.aims2007.org; Business Information Systems (BIS), http://bis.kie.ae.poznan.pl; International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B), http://www.ice-b.org; International Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE), http://www.icete.org; and International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), http://www.iceis.org.As always, thanks for your support of SIGMIS. We encourage your involvement. Please contact any one of us with suggestions or other input.We look forward to seeing you at ACM-SIGMIS CPR'07!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it