Bibliographic record
Abstract
The organizing committees of 2021 International Conference on Advances in Optics and Computational Sciences (ICAOCS 2021) are proud to present the proceedings. ICAOCS 2021 was successfully held on January 21-23, 2021 in Ottawa, Canada. The proceedings contain a permanent record of what had been presented at the conference. We hope that you will find these proceedings volume inspiring, beneficial and exciting. ICAOCS 2021 intends to be a global forum for researchers and engineers to present and discuss recent innovations and new techniques related to optics, electricity, magnetics, structural mechanics, applied physics and computational science, as well as their analytical techniques and applications in engineering. Due to the prevention and control of COVID-19 and travel restrictions worldwide, ICAOCS 2021 adopted the format of virtual conference through network technology to provide a forum for experts and scholars to share real-time information and discuss. The conference included keynote speeches and online discussion, and each presenter has 25-30 minutes (including Q&A). List of Committees are available in this pdf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".