MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244055248 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2007.19283

Nursing News

2007· article· en· W4244055248 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex Humanitarian Emergencies the Focus of New Nursing NetworkThe first-ever international disaster response network for nurses has been launched by the International Council of Nurses (ICN), aiming to strengthen the response to the health needs of disaster-stricken populations.The network held its first meeting at the ICN Conference in Yokohama, Japan on June 1, 2007.This first meeting was intended to raise awareness of disaster-response issues and develop stress management techniques for emergency situations.The ICN Position Statement on Nurses and Disaster Preparedness can be accessed at www.icn.ch/psdisasterprep01.htm, and a special section of the ICN website is specifically devoted to disaster preparedness (www.icn.ch/disasterprep.htm)to better inform nurses.ICN is also developing disaster nurse competencies and is interested in supporting this work with educational and accreditation programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.469
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.009 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207