REVIEWS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ITALIAN FILM DIRECTORS IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, WILLIAM HOPE (ED.) (2010) New Castle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 208 pp., ISBN (10) 144382075X, h/bk, £39.99 | $59.99 FROM TERRONE TO EXTRACOMUNITARIO: NEW MANIFESTATIONS OF RACISM IN CONTEMPORARY ITALIAN CINEMA. SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS & CHANGING IMAGES IN A MULTI-CULTURAL GLOBALIZED SOCIETY, GRACE RUSSO BULLARO (ED.) (2010) Leicester, UK: Troubador Publishing Ltd., 456 pp., ISBN 9781848761766, p/bk, £15.95 | $24.95 CONFLICTS OF MEMORY. THE RECEPTION OF HOLOCAUST FILMS AND TV PROGRAMMES IN ITALY, 1945 TO THE PRESENT, EMILIANO PERRA (2010) Oxford: Peter Lang, 291 pp., ISBN 9783039118809, p/bk, $71.95 TRAGEDIA ALL’ITALIANA. ITALIAN CINEMA AND ITALIAN TERRORISMS, 1970–2008, ALAN O’LEARY (2011) Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, 284 pp., ISBN 9783039115747, p/bk, £36.00 | $58.95 ENTERING THE FRAME: CINEMA AND HISTORY IN THE FILMS OF YERVANT GIANIKIAN AND ANGELA RICCI LUCCHI, ROBERT LUMLEY (2011) New York: Peter Lang, 192 pp., ISBN 9783034301138, p/bk, $55.95 A TALE OF TWO MAFIAS: A REVIEW ESSAY MAFIA MOVIES: A READER, DANA RENGA (ED.) (2011) Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 398 pp., ISBN 978-0802096654, p/bk, $37.95 THE ITALIANIST: FILM ISSUE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".