Habilidades tecnológicas e ensino superior em jornalismo no Brasil: observação das exigências contemporâneas e seu contraste com as grades curriculares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo destaca as mudanças nas rotinas de produção da notícia impetradas pela evolução tecnológica, relacionando-as com a estrutura atual dos cursos de Jornalismo. Para isso, foi realizada uma observação das disciplinas oferecidas por instituições apontadas como as melhores segundo rankings especializados. Apresenta ainda uma síntese de ideias sobre o que é preciso para formar um profissional em Jornalismo, tendo como pano de fundo o desenvolvimento de uma Teoria do Jornalismo no país e as fronteiras com as múltiplas possibilidades de atuação profissional. A partir destas premissas, aponta: o profissional que produz informação de relevância social nas tecnologias digitais conectadas está se afastando do espaço de importância e referência social, devido ao seu uso de forma doméstica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".