MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244091399 · doi:10.1002/bjs.4728

Society of Academic and Research Surgery

2004· article· en· W4244091399 on OpenAlexaff
Preetesh Jain, A. R. Anderson, R Sowdi, J. MacFie, Julia Humphries, K G Burnand, Burtron H. Davis, Mark D. Robinson, P Declerck, A. Smith, Kathryn McCarthy, C Laban, S Bonner, Stephen A. Bustin, B Ogunkolade, Peter Jenkins, Richard L. Carpenter, Alison Waterworth, Jeffrey Arliss, Kieran Horgan, Valerie Speirs, AM Hanby, G. M. O’Donoghue, Graham Roche‐Nagle, J. Harmey, D. Bouchier-Hayes, Guy C. Warner, Paulo Eduardo Ocke Reis, Igor Jurišica, Mujahid Sultan, Christine Macmillan, Nigel Beasley, Antti Mäkitie, Sohrab Arora, Mahadeo A. Sukhai, R Gr Énman, Richard A. Wells, Dickon Hayne, Ralph Gilbert, Patrick Gullane, Jonathan C. Irish, Suzanne Kamel‐Reid, Michael Powar, S. Bhattacharya, BR Davidson, Salim Ahmed, Rebecca Hands, Feng Huang, Xiaojun Han, Patricia Shaw, Sina Dorudi

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SARS abstracts 1209 mean(s.e.m.) survival time 54(12) versus 92(7) months; P < 0•01) and diseasefree survival (n = 113; mean(s.e.m.) survival time 54(14) versus 102(6) months; P = 0•004) than those without.Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, BT was a predictor of disease-specific survival (P = 0•011) and disease-free survival (P = 0•02) independent of other pathological prognostic indicators.Conclusion: Colorectal cancer patients with BT in the mesenteric lymph nodes have a worse outcome.These data support the long-term significance of BT in colorectal cancer patients. Preoperative total parenteral nutrition enhances bacterial translocation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1960.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207