MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244098059 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14657736

Cost minimization of algorithms for scheduling parallel, single-threaded, heterogeneous, speed-scalable processors

2021· preprint· en· W4244098059 on OpenAlexaff
Rashid Khogali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityScheduling (production processes)Parallel computingSpeedupComputationOverhead (engineering)Dynamic voltage scalingDistributed computingEnergy consumptionReal-time computingAlgorithmOperating systemMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We synthesize online scheduling algorithms to optimally assign a set of arriving heterogeneous tasks to heterogeneous speed-scalable processors under the single threaded computing architecture. By using dynamic speed-scaling, where each processor's speed is able to dynamically change within hardware and software processing constraints, the goal of our algorithms is to minimize the total financial cost (in dollars) of response time and energy consumption (TCRTEC) of the tasks. In our work, the processors are heterogeneous in that they may differ in their hardware specifications with respect to maximum processing rate, power function parameters and energy sources. Tasks are heterogeneous in terms of computation volume, memory and minimum processing requirements. We also consider that the unit price of response time for each task is heterogeneous because the user may be willing to pay higher/lower unit prices for certain tasks, thereby increasing/decreasing their optimum processing rates. We model the overhead loading time incurred when a task is loaded by a given processor prior to its execution and assume it to be heterogeneous as well. Under the single threaded, single buffered computing architecture, we synthesize the SBDPP algorithm and its two other versions. Its first two versions allow the user to specify the unit price of energy and response time for executing each arriving task. The algorithm's second version extends the functionality of the first by allowing the user or the OS of the computing device to further modify a task's unit price of time or energy in order to achieve a linearly controlled operation point that lies somewhere in the economy-performance mode continuum of a task's execution. The algorithm's third version operates exclusively on the latter. We briefly extend the algorithm and its versions to consider migration, where an unfinished task is paused and resumed on another processor. The SBDPP algorithm is qualitatively compared against its two other versions. The SBDPP dispatcher is analytically shown to perform better than the well known Round Robin dispatcher in terms of the TCRTEC performance metric. Through simulations we deduce a relationship between the arrival rate of tasks, number of processors and response time of tasks. Under the Single threaded, multi-buffered computing architecture we have four contributions that constitute the SMBSPP algorithm. First, we propose a novel task dispatching strategy for assigning the tasks to the processors. Second, we propose a novel preemptive service discipline called Smallest remaining Computation Volume Per unit Price of response Time (SCVPPT) to schedule the tasks on the assigned processor. Third, we propose a dynamic speed-scaling function that explicitly determines the optimum processing rate of each task. Most of the simulations consider both stochastic and deterministic traffic conditions. Our simulation results show that SCVPPT outperforms the two known service disciplines, Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT) and the First Come First Serve (FCFS), in terms of minimizing the TCRTEC performance metric. The results also show that the algorithm's dispatcher drastically outperforms the well known Round Robin dispatcher with cost savings exceeding 100% even when the processors are mildly heterogeneous. Finally, analytical and simulation results show that our speed scaling function performs better than a comparable speed scaling function in current literature. Under a fixed budget of energy, we synthesize the SMBAD algorithm which uses the micro-economic laws of Supply and Demand (LSD) to heuristically adjust the unit price of energy in order to extend battery life and execute more than 50% of tasks on a single processor (under the single threaded, multi buffered computing architecture). By extending all our multiprocessor algorithms to factor independent (battery) energy sources that is associated with each processor, we analytically show that load balancing effects are induced on hetergeneous parallel processors. This happens when the unit price of energy is adjusted by the battery level of each processor in accordance with LSD. Furthermore, we show that a variation of this load balancing effect also occurs when the heterogeneous processors use a single battery as long as they operate at unconstrained processing rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207