MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244153951 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.7953

Emergency Salbutomal Inhaler

2017· article· en· W4244153951 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Matthew N. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInhalerAsthmaMedical emergencyMedicineAsthma attackEmergency departmentDry-powder inhalerEmergency medicineEmergency managementNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is thought by most to be a benign health issue, but the statistics say otherwise. In Canada there are over 146 000 emergency room visits and 500 deaths each year from asthma. An estimated 80% are preventable. These hospital visits cost the Canadian government over $135 million a year. A solution is needed and that solution is the Emergency Salbutomal Inhaler. I have designed a small, easy­to­carry, two­ dose, dry­powder asthma inhaler, with patent pending. The device can easily be attached to a keychain or necklace for carrying ease, and will be quickly accessible in the event of an asthma attack. When an asthmatic has an attack and goes to a hospital, they are given a maximum of 2 doses of the rescue drug Salbutomal. The device carries two doses. Thus, in a sense I have invented a hospital on a keychain for asthmatics. During an asthma attack there is no time to fumble with an inhaler; my easy­to­use design ensures relief will be provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207