Experimental Investigation of Foamy Oil Solution Gas Drive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental Investigation of Foamy Oil Solution Gas Drive A.M. Kamp; A.M. Kamp PDVSA Intevep Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar C. Heny; C. Heny PDVSA Intevep Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar L. Andarcia; L. Andarcia PDVSA Intevep Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar M. Lago; M. Lago PDVSA Intevep Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar A. Rodriguez A. Rodriguez PDVSA Intevep Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Porlamar, Margarita Island, Venezuela, March 2001. Paper Number: SPE-69725-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/69725-MS Published: March 12 2001 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Kamp, A.M., Heny, C., Andarcia, L., Lago, M., and A. Rodriguez. "Experimental Investigation of Foamy Oil Solution Gas Drive." Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Porlamar, Margarita Island, Venezuela, March 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/69725-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractA five-year laboratory and simulation investigation on heavy-oil solution-gas drive processes is reported. It is shown how the interpretation of these processes has changed over the years. Initially, it was attempted to take into account the "bubbly" character of the oil by changing the oil thermodynamical properties. Non-conventional PVT properties accounted for supersaturation and trapped gas bubbles. Later, in agreement with work in other research groups, the low produced gas-oil ratio and high recovery factors were modeled by introducing low gas-oil relative permeability. This allowed for history matching of laboratory and field data, but doubts remain about the predictive capacity of reservoir simulation models. This doubt is motivated by the observed flow geometry of the (dispersed flow), which is not physically taken into account in the reservoir simulation equations. It is concluded that more work is necessary on the determination of the mechanisms that govern the flow, and on the development ofm odels that more correctly represent the physics of dispersed gas-liquid flow in porous media. Further experiments in cores and micromodels, together with microscopic modeling of flow in pore spaces, should be part this work.IntroductionThe term foamy oil describes dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flow that occurs in heavy oil reservoirs during primary production1. This heavy oil production process for is often characterized by a behavior that differs from what would have been expected using traditional reservoir engineering and simulation. Typical observations are high production rates, high primary production recovery, and good pressure maintenance. Many of the heavy oil reservoirs where those observations have been made are situated in the Venezuelan Orinoco Belt2,3 and in Canada4,5 (e.g. Lloydminster).An extensive amount of papers has been published on these phenomena, in which possible explanations were offered, often with the premise of developing better models. Good review papers have appeared1 in which the different phenomenological models that have been developed are discussed.In this article, we do not present a complete review of the available work. Instead, we discuss some specific research that has been carried out in Venezuela over the last few years, focussing on some specific issues and viewpoints with regard to foamy oil. The review starts with work carried out five years ago. The main focus of that initial work was the investigation of apparent thermodynamical properties of foamy oil during depressurization. This initial work was related to a paper published by Kraus et al.6 on a pseudobubble point model for foamy oils. This model tried to incorporate the trapping of bubbles by the oil through changing the apparent oil properties. We implemented laboratory experiments in a PVT cell that allowed characterizing experimentally the trapping of gas by the oil7. The results were applied to field simulation showing improvement in the history matching of the production process. Keywords: permeability, experimental investigation, porous medium, solution gas drive, pvt measurement, spe 69725, flow in porous media, fluid dynamics, supersaturation, investigation Subjects: Fluid Characterization, Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Phase behavior and PVT measurements, Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".