MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification and Characterization of Zebrafish Mast Cells.

2006· article· en· W4244181156 on OpenAlexaff
Jason N. Berman, Jake Seibert, Amanda Crosby, Robert Fraser, Olga Gritsenko, Bill Pohajdak, Tong‐Jun Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishBiologyMolecular biologyDegranulationHaematopoiesisMyeloperoxidasePopulationGATA1Cell biologyImmunologyBiochemistryStem cellInflammationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mast cells (MCs) are well-known for their role in allergic reactions and inflammation, but their developmental origin is controversial. In addition, abnormal clonal proliferation of MCs, referred to as systemic mastocytosis (SM), may be associated with acute myeloid leukemia, portending a poor outcome. Mutations in the C-KIT tyrosine kinase have been identified in SM, that can be potentially targeted by small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The zebrafish is a robust model organism for studying hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis, and has an inherent capacity to accommodate genetic and chemical modifier screens. Thus, this system holds potential for elucidating MC lineage and for use in high-throughput screening of targeted therapeutics in MC diseases. MCs have not been previously described in zebrafish. We have identified putative MCs in adult zebrafish gill and intestine containing eosinophilic granules that stain with peroxidase acid shift (PAS) and toluidine blue, as well as with carboxypeptidase A5 (cpa5), a zebrafish homologue of the mammalian MC specific enzyme, CPA1. Electron microscopic analysis demonstrates a striking morphologic resemblance to mammalian MCs with abundant homogeneous dense granules. Classical functional studies reveal degranulation of these cells and increased histamine production upon stimulation with compound 48/80 and stimulated IgE. Whole mount in situ hybridization experiments on zebrafish embryos demonstrate cpa5 expression in a population of blood cells at 28 hours post-fertilization co-localizing with the early myeloid marker, pu.1, the granulocytic marker, mpo, and monocytic markers, l-plastin and lysozyme C. These data point to the existence of a zebrafish MC equivalent and suggests that this lineage arises at the level of the granulocyte/monocyte progenitor. Ongoing characterization of these cells will provide further insight into the mechanisms underlying MC development. Furthermore, a zebrafish cpa5 promoter element has been cloned and is being used to generate transgenic zebrafish lines. These transgenic zebrafish will provide a valuable tool in identifying new effective therapeutic agents targeting MCs in allergic and immune responses, as well as in their contribution to leukemic progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207