MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244195439 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0109

Castle Stopgap: Historical Reality, Literary Realism, and Oral Culture

2009· article· en· W4244195439 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katherine O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishNarrativeConventionGeorge (robot)LiteratureRealismHistorySubject (documents)Oral traditionAestheticsArtArt historySociologyPhilosophySocial scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maria Edgeworth’s Castle Rackrent (1800) relates the genealogy of the various Irish squires, and after reading this short novel King George iii reportedly said, “I know something now of my Irish subjects.” This article focuses on the issue of knowing, specifically knowing the Irish subject. I argue that knowledge and the processes of identification in the novel are ultimately made unintelligible by the gap between the different standards and practices of oral and literary cultures. To call the narrator Thady Quirk, the family retainer at Castle Rackrent, an unreliable narrator fails at marking how fundamentally his narration undermines every convention of the realist novel. Castle Rackrent is best understood as owing a profound debt to the virtuoso oral performance of Anglo-Gaelic culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.039
Scholarly communication0.0160.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207