Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sciences humaines, qu'elles en soient ou non conscientes, ont comme objet la signification. Aussi conviendrait-il qu'elles tirent toutes les leçons de l'herméneutique, science de l'interprétation; et l'interprétation, qu'il s'agisse de textes ou de conduites, use des mêmes méthodes, rencontre les mêmes difficultés. Or l'histoire de l'herméneutique a successivement mis en évidence les diverses dimensions qui constituent les réalités symboliques, objet de l'interprétation : niveau neutre des configurations textuelles, niveau poétique des stratégies de production, niveau esthétique des stratégies de réception. L'herméneutique est une sémiologie, mais la sémiologie est, elle aussi, une herméneutique; elles doivent toutes deux se fondre au sein d'une théorie de formes symboliques d'inspiration peircéenne, seule capable de dépasser les apories traditionnelles de l'herméneutique et les incertitudes de la sémiologie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".