Pyodermatitis—Pyostomatitis Vegetans: Two Cases and a Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Pyodermatitis–pyostomatitis vegetans (PD–PSV) is a rare vegetating, pustular, eosinophilic, mucocutaneous dermatosis characterized by mucocutaneous lesions of the genital, axillary, and oral regions, as well as on the scalp. Objective: We report two patients who were diagnosed with PD–PSV. The published cases of this rare disorder are reviewed. Results: The first patient presented with vegetating pustular plaques of the scalp, vulva, and mouth. The second patient initially showed pustules on fingers and then on toes. Vulva and mouth were later involved. There was no gastrointestinal involvement in either case. In both cases, histology revealed eosinophilic spongiosis with eosinophilic microabscesses and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. Direct immunofluorescence was negative. Conclusion: Pyodermatitis–pyostomatitis vegetans is a rare disorder of unknown cause. It bears similarities to pemphigus vegetans but histology, direct immunofluorescence, and clinical history show the differences. Response to treatment is generally rapid. In several reported cases, an inflammatory gastrointestinal disorder is found in association with the mucocutaneous signs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".