MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244281484 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2015.5b12

Progress Being Made at Understanding, Treating Complicated Grief

2015· article· en· W4244281484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Zagorski

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriefComplicated griefPsychologyPsychoanalysisPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical and Research NewsFull AccessProgress Being Made at Understanding, Treating Complicated GriefNick ZagorskiNick ZagorskiPublished Online:12 May 2015https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2015.5b12AbstractColumbia University's M. Katherine Shear, M.D., has been leading the way in untangling when the normal grieving process goes awry and how to restore the balance with psychotherapy.For a long time, the psychiatric community has had a mixed understanding of grief. The concept of grief as an important part of dealing with loss was well recognized, and a trained professional could easily identify someone going through the grieving process. But, as M. Katherine Shear, M.D., the Marion E. Kenworthy Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University, pointed out, "What wasn't covered during my training—and something that I think is still lacking—was a discussion of what grief itself actually entailed." M. Katherine Shear, M.D., says that revisiting the loss of a loved one is a crucial part of the complicated grief healing process."What sort of forms does [grief] take? How long do we expect it to last? And importantly, is there a point at which grief becomes problematic?" Shear continued.Such questions were daunting, but ones that many medical professionals at the time did not focus on because they ascribed to the same mantra found among the general public: everyone grieves in his or her own way.Shear, however, was determined to come up with answers to her questions about grief. For the past two decades, she has been leading efforts to delineate the line between healthy and unhealthy grieving and develop a strategy to treat "complicated grief" (CG). The efforts of Shear and her colleagues are beginning to pay off; complicated grief is now recognized in DSM-5 as a disorder in need of further study (tentatively named persistent complex bereavement disorder), and it is set to be described in the upcoming 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (as prolonged grief disorder). In addition, Shear developed a successful behavioral intervention—complicated grief therapy, or CGT. "It's impressive to see how far we've come," said Charles Reynolds III, M.D., an endowed professor of geriatric psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). He has worked with Shear in this area since the early days. "We now recognize complicated grief as a serious condition that affects about 1 in 10 people who experience a loss; it does not go away by itself, and it is a risk factor for both suicidal ideation and cardiac disease."But we also now have a targeted therapy, an active body of ongoing research, and we have made progress in clarifying the diagnostic criteria," Reynolds continued. "It wouldn't surprise me to see complicated grief fully recognized in DSM-5.1." Complicated Grief Is Complex Amalgam The diagnostic specifics are still being worked out, but at its core, complicated grief is characterized by intense grieving that is both persistent (currently 12 months or more for an adult or six months or more for youth) and impairs a person's ability to function.While previously viewed as a form of depression that stemmed from the loss and bereavement, these incidences of persistent and problematic grief also displayed signs of adjustment disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Shear observed. So in devising a targeted therapeutic strategy, she reached out to several experts for help, such as Ellen Frank, Ph.D, who was using interpersonal therapy (IPT) to treat depression in the elderly, and the University of Pennsylvania's Edna Foa, Ph.D., a leader in PTSD. Foa had developed a treatment known as prolonged exposure, which encourages patients to remember and engage with the traumatic events rather than avoid them.The team infused elements of these different approaches to create a targeted intervention for complicated grief. While patients enrolled in pilot studies of CGT did report improvements in mood, the researchers discovered that many patients dropped out after the first few sessions. Complicated Grief Symposium to Be Held at Annual MeetingThose interested in learning more about complicated grief (CG) can join M. Katherine Shear, M.D., and other clinicians in this field on Sunday, May 17, at 8 a.m. for "Optimizing Treatment of Complicated Grief: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial." This symposium will feature a discussion on CG psychotherapy, updates on the performance of proposed criteria sets, and preliminary findings from the multicenter clinical study addressing the utility of antidepressant therapy as a component of CG treatment. The location of the symposium is Rooms 201 A-F, Level 200, North Building, Toronto Convention Centre.After reflecting on these results, Shear had an epiphany—complicated grief was not about depression and loss; it was an expression of love."When we grieve, we are expressing a desire to be with our lost loved one," she said. "And the thoughts that trigger the outward symptoms are often positive, not just negative."Over time, the reactions aroused by those thoughts dissipate—but in the case of complicated grief, the stimulus remains strong. "That led me to consider the angle that complicated grief might be a form of craving bearing some resemblance to substance abuse," Shear said.Working with that notion, Shear sought out another UPMC colleague, Allan Zuckoff, Ph.D., a psychologist who was using motivational interviewing (MI) to help people with substance abuse problems commit to treatment.The strategy for MI is to work collaboratively with patients to explore and resolve their ambivalence about changing their behavior—in the case of complicated grief, ambivalence is about acknowledging the finality of the loss. "I had seen the potential of MI to resolve ambivalence for a variety of problems, and when Kathy approached me about joining her group, I was fascinated by the idea of engaging people to move on from loss," Zuckoff told Psychiatric News.People with CG worry that if their grief goes away, they might forget the person who died or that it reflects that they didn't love the person as much as they believed, Zuckoff explained."An important aspect of the CGT process is affirming that we are not trying to extinguish the grief," Zuckoff said. "We want people to be able to access memories of their loved one, but in a way that is more controlled and less dominated by pain."CGT May Offer Benefits Over IPT, CBTShear and her colleagues have carried out three large, randomized clinical studies with CGT, and the results have been impressive so far. A 2005 trial involving 95 middle-aged adults (average age 49) found that CGT was nearly twice as effective as interpersonal therapy (IPT), with a 51 percent response rate compared with 28 percent, respectively.This past November, a follow-up trial of 151 older adults (average age 66) found a similarly marked improvement, with CGT having a 70 percent response rate compared with 32 percent for IPT.The recent work is critical. "CGT is gaining wide acceptance," Shear noted, "but there are still some professionals who question why you would encourage people to revisit their traumatic loss, which can be a painful experience," she said. "And there has been reluctance to try CGT in geriatric populations. These latest findings have been very positive in that regard."A few weeks after her study, researchers in Australia found that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) coupled with prolonged exposure was more effective at treating complicated grief than CBT alone, validating that revisiting the loss of a loved one is a crucial part of the CG healing process.As experts continue to examine the benefits of CGT, they continue to search for potential risk factors for CG. A number of studies have suggested higher rates of CG among people who have experienced sudden and violent deaths, such as military personnel, while a recent study in Palliative Medicine found that preexisting depression may increase the risk of CG in older adults.Shear is currently leading a large, multicenter trial of over 400 participants to examine the efficacy of antidepressants alone or in combination with CGT. While the trial keeps her busy, Shear is focusing most of her time in 2015 on dissemination. She recently penned a feature in the New England Journal of Medicine and is engaged in rolling out CGT to primary care clinics throughout New York state. "We need to make the public aware and get therapists trained," she said. ■"Complicated Grief" can be accessed in the January 8, 2015, New England Journal of Medicine here. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207