Boundary effects on the illusory continuity of an interrupted glide through a notched noise.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the illusory continuity of an interrupted frequency glide through a notched-noise burst. A 2I-2AFC procedure was used to measure detection of the (target) portion of the frequency glide that overlapped in time with the noise. The portions of the glide preceding and following the noise (flankers) could be present or absent. The center frequency of the notch coincided with either the frequency end-point of the flanker that preceded the noise, or the onset frequency of the flanker that followed the noise. A control condition with a wide-band noise burst (absent notch) was also included. Performance was poorest in the absent notch condition, and was significantly poorer with present than with absent flankers. This suggests that listeners perceptually restored the missing target when flankers were present. Performance was also less accurate (indicating stronger illusory continuity) when the notch was centered on the end-point of the flanker that preceded the noise. These results suggest that the masking of the onset of the flanker following the noise provides a stronger cue to the perception of continuity than the masking of the offset of the flanker that precedes the noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".