MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244302603 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100018801

Erratum

2003· erratum· fr· W4244302603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2003
Typeerratum
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedicineNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On page 240, in the Abstract, under Results, the first sentence should read "The five-year tumor control probability (TC) for benign versus atypical/malignant meningiomas were 92.7% vs. 31% (P=.006)."On page 243, Table 3, the SRS/FSRT dose for patient 2 should read "4000 cGy/60% (20 fractions)."On page 246, right column, paragraph 1, the first two sentences should read "None of the seven reirradiated patients (three SRS and four FSRT) in our series developed any late complications.The range of doses for SRS and FSRT were 1200-2000 cGy and 4000-5000 cGy, respectively."The authors apologize for the errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.026
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicNutrition, Health, and Society StudiesFrench-language works237,207