MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244320771 · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975482.61

XOR Codes and Sparse Learning Parity with Noise

2019· book-chapter· en· W4244320771 on OpenAlexaff
Andrej Bogdanov, Manuel Sabin, Prashant Nalini Vasudevan

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersChinese University of Hong KongNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsRandom variableCombinatoricsModuloDecoding methodsDiscrete mathematicsParity (physics)AlgorithmStatisticsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A k-LIN instance is a system of m equations over n variables of the form si1 + · · · + sik = 0 or 1 modulo 2 (each involving k variables). We consider two distributions on instances in which the variables are chosen independently and uniformly but the right-hand sides are different. In a noisy planted instance, the right-hand side is obtained by evaluating the system on a random planted solution and adding independent noise with some constant bias to each equation; whereas in a random instance, the right-hand side is uniformly random. Alekhnovich (FOCS 2003) conjectured that the two are hard to distinguish when k = 3 and m = O(n). We give a sample-efficient reduction from solving noisy planted k-LIN instances (a sparse-equation version of the Learning Parity with Noise problem) to distinguishing them from random instances. Suppose that m-equation, n-variable instances of the two types are efficiently distinguishable with advantage ε. Then, we show that O(m · (m/ε)2/k)-equation, n-variable noisy planted k-LIN instances are efficiently solvable with probability exp –Õ((m/ε)6/k). Our solver has worse success probability but better sample complexity than Applebaum's (SICOMP 2013). We extend our techniques to show that this can generalize to (possibly non-linear) k-CSPs. The solver is based on a new approximate local list-decoding algorithm for the k-XOR code at large distances. The k-XOR encoding of a function F: ∑ → {–1, 1} is its k-th tensor power Fk(x1, …, xk) = F(x1) · · · F(xk). Given oracle access to a function G that µ-correlates with Fk, our algorithm, say for constant k, outputs the description of a message that Ω(µ1/k)-correlates with F with probability exp(–Õ(µ−4/k)). Previous decoders, for such k, have a worse dependence on µ (Levin, Combinatorica 1987) or do not apply to subconstant µ1/k. We also prove a new XOR lemma for this parameter regime. The decoder and its analysis rely on a new structure-versus-randomness dichotomy for general Boolean-valued functions over product sets, which may be of independent interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksSame topicMachine Learning and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207