MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244337624 · doi:10.1353/fch.0.0028

Preface

2010· article· en· W4244337624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathalie Dessens

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Colonial History · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismGovernment (linguistics)HistoryLibrary sciencePolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface Nathalie Dessens My first volume as editor of French Colonial History attests to the continued vitality of our society. It includes articles by graduate students as well as established scholars working in North America, Europe, and New Zealand. Five articles emanate from papers delivered at the 2007 and 2008 conferences (in La Rochelle and Quebec), and three of them were not presented at any of the society's meetings, in keeping with a new policy that encourages members to submit articles for publication even when they are unable to attend the yearly conference. Although several excellent articles issued from papers presented at this year's San Francisco conference were ready for publication in this volume, they had to be moved to the next for lack of space. This surely means that French Colonial History is faring well. North America is overrepresented in this volume, a quite unusual fact reflecting the core of the debates at the Quebec meeting. Louisiana is examined through three articles, two of them powerful echoes of the plight of New Orleans under the assaults of Hurricane Katrina, just after the commemoration of the fourth anniversary of its destructive attack on the city. While Marion Stange examines the issue of health and sanitization during the colonial era, Gordon Sayre guides our steps through a newly discovered manuscript map of eighteenth-century Louisiana by Le Page du Pratz. Departing from geographical and ecological considerations, Julien Vernet dwells on the protest movements against the federal government in the immediate postcolonial era. Germaine Warkentin studies the recently uncovered Codex canadensis, a collection of drawings made by the Jesuit Louis Nicolas, revealing as much about [End Page vii] New France in the seventeenth century as about the perceptions Europeans had of the New World. Anne Marie Jonah writes a very stimulating study narrating and comparing the experiences of two métis women in eighteenth-century Île Royale, again bearing as much on what it meant to be a métis woman in this New World society as on how French authorities perceived métissage. Adrian Muckle's article on New Caledonia, a far too rarely studied area of French colonization, also explores the way colonial policies revealed the conception the French had of their colonizing mission; a similar topic underlies David Harvey's questioning of the perception of Native Americans in pre-Enlightenment France, and, to some extent, Kathryn Edwards's examination of the crucial (and topical) aspect of the memorialization of colonization in France through the Georges Boudarel controversy. Beyond a certain geographical consistency, this volume thus deals with matters specific to various French colonies at key moments in their history, while always remaining attentive to how much they reveal the French perception of colonization, and thus the specific features of French colonization. In this first preface, I want to express my gratitude to Elizabeth Demers for her tutoring, and for all the work she had done on the articles before she handed over the editorship to me last June. I also want to thank the team at Michigan State University Press for their patience and extraordinary help and response to my numerous queries. Without them, the transition would have been much more difficult. My thanks also go to the authors, who never complained whenever I sent them their articles for one more set of revisions, and to the reviewers, who made their expertise readily available to French Colonial History. [End Page viii] Copyright © 2010 French Colonial Historical Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4040.265

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench Colonial HistorySame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207