MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4244337624 · doi:10.1353/fch.0.0028

Preface

2010· article· en· W4244337624 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrench Colonial History · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismGovernment (linguistics)HistoryLibrary sciencePolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Preface Nathalie Dessens My first volume as editor of French Colonial History attests to the continued vitality of our society. It includes articles by graduate students as well as established scholars working in North America, Europe, and New Zealand. Five articles emanate from papers delivered at the 2007 and 2008 conferences (in La Rochelle and Quebec), and three of them were not presented at any of the society's meetings, in keeping with a new policy that encourages members to submit articles for publication even when they are unable to attend the yearly conference. Although several excellent articles issued from papers presented at this year's San Francisco conference were ready for publication in this volume, they had to be moved to the next for lack of space. This surely means that French Colonial History is faring well. North America is overrepresented in this volume, a quite unusual fact reflecting the core of the debates at the Quebec meeting. Louisiana is examined through three articles, two of them powerful echoes of the plight of New Orleans under the assaults of Hurricane Katrina, just after the commemoration of the fourth anniversary of its destructive attack on the city. While Marion Stange examines the issue of health and sanitization during the colonial era, Gordon Sayre guides our steps through a newly discovered manuscript map of eighteenth-century Louisiana by Le Page du Pratz. Departing from geographical and ecological considerations, Julien Vernet dwells on the protest movements against the federal government in the immediate postcolonial era. Germaine Warkentin studies the recently uncovered Codex canadensis, a collection of drawings made by the Jesuit Louis Nicolas, revealing as much about [End Page vii] New France in the seventeenth century as about the perceptions Europeans had of the New World. Anne Marie Jonah writes a very stimulating study narrating and comparing the experiences of two métis women in eighteenth-century Île Royale, again bearing as much on what it meant to be a métis woman in this New World society as on how French authorities perceived métissage. Adrian Muckle's article on New Caledonia, a far too rarely studied area of French colonization, also explores the way colonial policies revealed the conception the French had of their colonizing mission; a similar topic underlies David Harvey's questioning of the perception of Native Americans in pre-Enlightenment France, and, to some extent, Kathryn Edwards's examination of the crucial (and topical) aspect of the memorialization of colonization in France through the Georges Boudarel controversy. Beyond a certain geographical consistency, this volume thus deals with matters specific to various French colonies at key moments in their history, while always remaining attentive to how much they reveal the French perception of colonization, and thus the specific features of French colonization. In this first preface, I want to express my gratitude to Elizabeth Demers for her tutoring, and for all the work she had done on the articles before she handed over the editorship to me last June. I also want to thank the team at Michigan State University Press for their patience and extraordinary help and response to my numerous queries. Without them, the transition would have been much more difficult. My thanks also go to the authors, who never complained whenever I sent them their articles for one more set of revisions, and to the reviewers, who made their expertise readily available to French Colonial History. [End Page viii] Copyright © 2010 French Colonial Historical Society

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,179
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,173 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle