MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244348701 · doi:10.5038/2640-6489.3.2.1045

Editorial: Volume 3 - Issue 2

2018· editorial· en· W4244348701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Business Insights · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEditorial boardPublishingPleasurePrideGlobalizationPolitical scienceMedia studiesLibrary scienceSociologyComputer scienceLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is with a great pleasure that we welcome you to the first issue of the Journal of Global Business Insights (JGBI). JGBI, originally established in 2015, was known as International Interdisciplinary Business-Economics Advancement (IIBA) Journal from 2015-2018. This journal was born with several things in mind. In today’s world, globalization is becoming the norm, thanks to the technology. For this reason, we wanted to create a journal that has a global focus. The journal welcomed distinguished, global editorial board. We would like to thank each of them for their dedication for a new journal. We also wanted to create a true open-access journal without any commercial interests. JGBI is created, managed and maintained by true volunteers. It is with a great pride to tell that sending papers, publishing papers and accessing them are 100% free. JGBI aims to provide an intellectual platform and ideas for international scholars, by promoting interdisciplinary studies related to business and social science. With this goal in mind, we welcome you to the Volume 3 – Issue 2, the first issue under the JGBI. Our first issue present five great articles. The first paper by Zhang Ying and Cainan Zhang presents case study of comprehensive benefit evaluation and management of forest ecosystem services in Zhalantun city of Inner Mongolia, China. Second article by Marica Mazurek discusses smart management systems (Triple Helix model) in Waterloo, Canada. On another dimension, third article by Rupam Konar and Kashif Hussain investigates the expenditure and experience of international conference delegates visiting Malaysia. Fourth article by Laiba Ali, Wong F. Yee, Ng S. Imm, and Muhammad S. Akhtar discusses the price fairness, guest emotions, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in peer to peer accommodation sector. Finally, Tingting Zhang presents employee wellness innovations in hospitality workplaces: learning from high-tech corporations. We welcome your comments and suggestions. In the future issues, we would like to integrate new sections into JGBI such as industry insights, case studies, book reviews, and opinion papers. We would like to thank Association of North America Higher Education International (ANAHEI) and University of South Florida, Scholar Commons for publishing JGBI and making it accessible to the world population. We believe that with your support, JGBI will be indexed in major indexes in a short time. We also would like to invite you submit an article to JGBI. In addition, we welcome your proposals for a special issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it