MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244387389 · doi:10.5539/apr.v10n3p20

Fermat’s Last Theorem proven in one page

2018· article· en· W4244387389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Do Tan Si

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFermat's Last TheoremSimple (philosophy)Root (linguistics)OmegaMathematicsPhysicsCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We attempt to prove the Fermat’s Last Theorem by a simple method consisted in transforming the relation b^m=(a+n)^m-a^m into an equation in n by introduction of a parameter ɷ depending in a,n such that b=omega^(m(m-1)) then equalizing in b^m these two relations. Afterward, exploiting the condition that this equation must have only one root so that the coefficients of powers of n^i must have alternating signs, we arrive to conclude that the equation in n has roots only for m=1,2 and no root for m>2 thus prove the theorem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207